standardizing causes divisions

It occurs to me that we live in a society that wants everything to conform to one image.  Of course we demand everyone else to change to our image, so we do not have to change.  When someone does not conform to our image we label and disassociate with them.

In churches, the Pastor or some board, or some committee will put down a set of beliefs and everyone is expected to believe and not question those beliefs.  People who do not believe in their hearts those things either will have to lie about what they believe or leave and go elsewhere so they can find people who believe the same way that they do.  This is how churches split & different denominations are formed.

In business, employers demand that employees be carbon copies of each other, much like they do the machines that they own.  Schools have to try to teach the same thing in the same way to all students and when not all students respond the same way then society places the blame on the Teachers.  We are taught that all marriages should look the same way, like we all live in the town of Stepford.

The problem with this line of thought as I see it is this:  First, all of us have been created different.  We have different strengths and different weaknesses.  We also have had different things that have happened to us and that have caused us to be even more different.  Also since all of us are different, than all combinations of us will be different also.  No two successful marriages will be exactly the same , even when one person remarries.  What will work in one company, may not work in another because all the people will be different.

In standardizing, we lose the ability to appreciate the differences between us.  Churches will no longer touch a person's heart because none there can deal with someone not sharing the same views wholeheartedly.  Standardizing will cause missed friendships as well as marriages ending in divorce because people are not created to be carbon copies of each other.

I think that the root cause of standardizing is that we do not respect the right of someone else to have a different opinion from us, even if their opinion is wrong. We no longer can share with each other what we believe and this is why I believe it, or this is the questions that I have about that.

It also seems to me that when we respect the right for people to have an opinion than us, even if that opinion is wrong, we bring unity to everything.  Marriages and friendships become stronger. Businesses discover a new resource to create more business.  Churches will once again start touching people's hearts.

When we truly love each other, we will not demand other people to be just like us.  We give them a safe place to be then we are able to share what we believe.  This will actually allow God to change all of us into the person He meant for us to be.

How for me focusing on love instead of doing the right thing is better.

Back in school, I used to be obsessed with doing the right thing.  I do not think that I ever demanded that from any of my classmates, but I did for myself.  It was something that drove me.

I guess that the main reason that I demanded it of myself was that I thought that if I proved myself to be good enough then I could be loved.  In other words, I was trying to win love from people and God.  I never was good enough to accomplished that.

What that attitude did do was to create a false persona about me.  In a way, I wore a mask.  Not the type of mask that people wear at Halloween, but it still kept people from knowing me.  That mask not only kept others from knowing me, but it also kept me from revealing my heart to others.  Honestly, if anyone reads this that knew me back then, what do you remember about me?  Was it just that I played football, that I was quiet and shy, that I sometimes had a smile on my face, or maybe that I usually made good grades?  Even my closest friends did not know a lot of things about me.

That attitude carried over into my adult years.  As I grew and started questioning some of my beliefs, a couple of things happened.  When I found out that a couple of things that I took for truth were wrong, I started reviewing everything that I believed.  If one thing was wrong, then I knew that it was possible that a lot of things were wrong. 

As I was going through those changes, the focus became on how my actions affected others.  For instance, I could not go to a bar even if I did not drink anything there because someone might see me that would develop a drinking problem, and I would be accountable for the bad influence that I had on them.  So I could not do anything that might would cause somebody else to do wrong.  So, I thought that I still needed to wear that mask.  That forced me to retreat into places where everyone else acted the same way that I did and we all would gather around with our masks on with no one ever really knew the other. 

Those actions were even worse than the first, because everything that was wrong in the 1st place was still there, but only now I also was a hypocrite because I really did not believe what I pretended too.  My kids and parents are amazed at some of things that I do and say now because it does not line up with what they remember about me.

There came a time a few years ago when I was forced to take off my mask.  The feeling when that happened was like getting caught without your clothes on, but it was also freeing.  The verse that said that Jesus did not break bruised reeds or snuff out smoldering embers became a special one to me.  I came to realize that God loved me without me being perfect, righteous, or holy.  That no matter how bad I hurt, He would never hurt me more.  

As I let His love inside and grow within me, I am learning that I can love others the same way.  His love is also changing me.  I am still wanting to do the right thing, but because He is changing me inwardly so I am not having to "discipline" myself and force myself to do it, and that my actions come out of love and not for love.

I have more friends now than I have ever had, but not everyone likes this "new" me.  That is OK.  It is not up to me to change them.  So, even that frees me to love.

Safe Relationships

“Safe is a place where you can get out the worst thing about you and they don’t run you off, talk you down, or head for the hills….Safe is where you are loved more for revealing your ‘problems’, not less.”

This is a quote from the book Bo's Cafe which deals with relationships among people and while doing it reveals what we as the church should look like.  It is also something that I have only experience in a group setting only once.  It happened within what I call a subcultural of a church congregation where the main obstacles were the formal leadership of the congregation (Pastor, Church staff, Deacons, etc.). Even among my individual "friendships", it has only happened a couple of times.


I bring this up because since there some relationships forming within the alumni group that have the potential to be this way.  For the first time in about 10 years, I have people in my life that I feel safe around.  Now I am not talking about physical safety, but safety as described above.  Now this can grow into relationships like the group in Bo's Cafe or not, I guess that is up to us.  


All of us have problems.  There are no all together people.  Super religious people who stand above everyone and who are closer to God are just a myth and do not exist.  People who present themselves this way are only showing a mask that is covering up all of their faults.  These people can never truly be a part of a safe relationship because they are frauds, actors, hypocrites.  


So the question is which direction do we go from here?  I would like to close this blog with another quote from Bo's Cafe.




"This relational stuff, the good stuff?  Well, its messy man.  Because it demands that you care about something more than getting better before you can ever get better."

Enigmas

Every now and then something will come up that will be an enigma to me and I will spend time trying to figure it out.  At this moment that would be Trop Rock.  I had never heard this term until Cindy started talking and posting and writing about it.  What is and what is not Trop Rock music and where is the dividing line.   Why is Jimmy Buffet Trop Rock and Alan Jackson not?  Are the Beach Boys the original Trop Rock musicians?  What keeps "Galveston" from being a Trop Rock song?  What is a Trop Rock lifestyle and how is that different from a country lifestyle?

I know I can be obsessed at times when it comes to enigmas.  This obsession can and has cause changes in my life.  It was an enigma that took me from being concerned about people in traditional church who "fell through the cracks" and dropped out (along with trying to make sense out of what happened to me within church and why I could no longer find comfort and belonging there) to a new outlook on church community and following God.

I could go on and on about the enigmas in my life but by now you have the picture.   I have found that when I let myself look at the mysteries around me and allow questions to come then whether or not I find any answers, my life is enriched

My thoughts on the book, "What I Believe" by Count Leo Tolstoy

I really enjoy hearing or reading what someone believes and how and why they believe it.  It applies even when I do not agree with what they say.  When someone goes to the trouble to share what they believe, I believe that it is a gift and they should not suffer any personal attacks when they are honest.  So, I will not be issuing any of that here.  However, I do believe that discussing the issues are appropriate and that gives me and others the chance to share what we believe.  That is what I am going to try to do here.


As someone who has spent most of his life as a Southern Baptist with their fundamental studies on what they believe;  I believe that Tolstroy does a good job in laying out his beliefs.  The main problem that I had with his teachings is the same one that I have with most fundamental writings and that is they start in the wrong place.  I believe that one must start with "God is a person who wants to have a close relationship with us and He Himself is Love and He loves us",  and build on that.  I did not see that happening here.

 Tolstoy takes the passage that is commonly call "The Sermon On The Mount" (Matthew 5-7), and bases his whole belief on what he has gotten from these passages.  If I understood the book right, then the teaching seemed to me that to be a Christian then one must be taking these teachings to the extreme and applying them as laws or a code of living for us to live by.

He teaches us that, "We must never be angry with anyone or kill even in war, never resist evil done to you,  never divorce, never take any oaths, never sit in  judgement against anyone, never make distinctions between us and foreign nations or peoples."  I believe that love may lead people to these same actions, but if it is not carried out from love then the act is meaningless.

Tolstroy also makes a list of things that cause happiness and that list did intrigue me.  He said:

1.  All need to have a life where the link between him and nature is not destroyed.

2.  All need to do congenial, free, physical labor.  (Forced Labor is no different than doing no labor in bringing happiness)

3.  All need a family life.

4.  All need a free friendly communication with all people.

5.  All need health and a painless death.

That is a brief nutshell of the book and my thoughts.